maybe for the more accented vocals (such as when the singer says "talk" in the chorus) it'd be better to have a 5-note chord rather than a 4, i think it represents them better.
I suggest making this sound a 5-note chord because its a crash (i think) and its impactful enough for the dense chord. This should be applied to every other instances such as 80260
maybe you could rearrange this 1/6th pattern here? This anchor was unexpected and was kinda awkward to play, doesn't flow well in my opinion. Also happens with 188366|4,188517|4,188669|4.
This section is copy pasted and mirrored but the song's different, you forgot to double check!
This should be a quad tbh, it's a more impactful sound yet the chord density represented by it went the wrong way
maybe for the more accented vocals (such as when the singer says "talk" in the chorus) it'd be better to have a 5-note chord rather than a 4, i think it represents them better.
This should be a 5-note chord, it has a "hey!" vocal and a drum sound, also found the same issue at 79805 and any other instances.
I suggest making this sound a 5-note chord because its a crash (i think) and its impactful enough for the dense chord. This should be applied to every other instances such as 80260
you could also put a double here, would feel more natural since the instrument takes a dive in pitch, do this for other instances aswell
since you charted the hihats as doubles you should probably make this a double aswell, do this with other instances im too lazy to type them all
maybe you could rearrange this 1/6th pattern here? This anchor was unexpected and was kinda awkward to play, doesn't flow well in my opinion. Also happens with 188366|4,188517|4,188669|4.
Kind of changed it but I personally don't think it's that bad and it fits the music