the emphasis here feels wrong, it would much rather fit if these were 2 short 1/4 LNs instead cause the guitar does give off a significant sound that would justify it
222586|4,222745|3,222745|2,222905|4,223064|1,223064|2 the representation here also seems to change comparing to the previous section
maybe im not hearing something (do keep in mind in not good at hearing quiet sounds cause of my hearing disability) but if there isnt anything significant changing, i would personally keep it the same as the previous repetition
i would really appreciate if you put emphasis on the finish
making them jumps would spice up the section a lot more to make it more distinct from the previous one
++ on the difficulty ramp up in the end, really well executed
wrong snap here or am i tripping?
pretty sure it's 1/6
pretty sure this should be 1/8
i havent seen a single section with 1/6 in this song yet
the emphasis here feels wrong, it would much rather fit if these were 2 short 1/4 LNs instead cause the guitar does give off a significant sound that would justify it
222586|4,222745|3,222745|2,222905|4,223064|1,223064|2 the representation here also seems to change comparing to the previous section
maybe im not hearing something (do keep in mind in not good at hearing quiet sounds cause of my hearing disability) but if there isnt anything significant changing, i would personally keep it the same as the previous repetition
the former one has shorter guitar sounds while the latter guitar sounds are longer
this note seems very misleading on what it's trying to represent
i would personally change it to a LN and make it fill in the gap to the next LN
made it a short ln
i would really appreciate if you put emphasis on the finish
making them jumps would spice up the section a lot more to make it more distinct from the previous one
the pitch relevancy would justify the long note being in col1 here instead. Would also play much better overall