This note is offsync. I would suggest moving it down to 1/10's 118453 timing.
After moving this you will actually realized that there is another sound on 118516 of 1/12, so you need to add a note there.
According to the rhythm usage at 19453 the way you did it is stack start on 1/2 red line and then next beat there is no stack. I assume this is to emphasize the synth thingy.
So, it is much more consistent to make 15703 a stack (move to 2 or 4 I guess) and then 16171 shouldn't be a stack with 16406
oh i get why you're confused - i didn't put any thought into these other than putting the 1/2 note opposite of the LN most of the time. applied some changes, hopefully i changed it like you meant
This note is offsync. I would suggest moving it down to 1/10's 118453 timing.
After moving this you will actually realized that there is another sound on 118516 of 1/12, so you need to add a note there.
seems more correct. it was approximated to make it simple to play but i changed the approach now
following this i also changed 119687 slightly
According to the rhythm usage at 19453 the way you did it is stack start on 1/2 red line and then next beat there is no stack. I assume this is to emphasize the synth thingy.
So, it is much more consistent to make 15703 a stack (move to 2 or 4 I guess) and then 16171 shouldn't be a stack with 16406
I am confused on why these are stacks, as there are no accentuated piano(?) sound like 12890|1,13125|1 this part.
9140|2,9375|1 this on the other hand should be stacked to play accentuated sound I mentioned (like you did at 12890)
oh i get why you're confused - i didn't put any thought into these other than putting the 1/2 note opposite of the LN most of the time. applied some changes, hopefully i changed it like you meant