Hands like these don't really make much sense to me being hands. I get it's for the synths but the backbeat is already being charted as hands and it makes the chart much denser than it needs to be. Maybe chart this as a single or jump, or even an LN
I don't entirely agree with how you chart jumps here and in similar instances of this sound. It'd be a lot better in my opinion if you were to either make these more screechier parts LN heavy or just single note streams
From 46076 to 53835 the LN usage isn't all too consistent and I don't feel like it adds much to this section of the map, you could definitely get away with removing them and not having much change in terms of structure
nitpick+subjective, tho personally shortening these by 1/4 then apply a triple at 128318 would be nice for chord emphasis (the fact that there are 2 continuous shields on this suggestion can also convey the continuous nature of the instrumental synth)
apparently 102455|2,102455|3,102455|4,102800|1,102800|3,103145|4,103231|3,103317|2,103404|1 has inconsistent patterning with the one mentioned above (despite representing the same musicial section) so please apply the same pattern for both sections.
Random quad that doesn't really make sense being here as the sound you're charting to here has been mapped as hands before this point
Hands like these don't really make much sense to me being hands. I get it's for the synths but the backbeat is already being charted as hands and it makes the chart much denser than it needs to be. Maybe chart this as a single or jump, or even an LN
Apply this change to other instances of this during the chorus
I don't entirely agree with how you chart jumps here and in similar instances of this sound. It'd be a lot better in my opinion if you were to either make these more screechier parts LN heavy or just single note streams
If you do decide to apply this change apply it to similar parts of the chart
From 46076 to 53835 the LN usage isn't all too consistent and I don't feel like it adds much to this section of the map, you could definitely get away with removing them and not having much change in terms of structure
pretty sure this is the same as 31421|4,31421|2,31464|3,31464|1 (and similar iterations), please fix to two 1/6 doubles like the mentioned example.
nitpick+subjective, tho personally shortening these by 1/4 then apply a triple at 128318 would be nice for chord emphasis (the fact that there are 2 continuous shields on this suggestion can also convey the continuous nature of the instrumental synth)
overall i think the mentioned suggestion seperates the notes more clearly as well as giving proper emphasis to the kicks
apparently 102455|2,102455|3,102455|4,102800|1,102800|3,103145|4,103231|3,103317|2,103404|1 has inconsistent patterning with the one mentioned above (despite representing the same musicial section) so please apply the same pattern for both sections.
since there's no buzz/buzzy-kick here (or it's unnoticeable) this can be removed
move this to 30904 then add a note there on col3 to match the kick
i'm pretty sure these must be a 1/6 roll for the buzz
uhhh i overhighlighted, only 30386|4,30386|3 should be changed. tldr; move 30386|3 to 30430.
move 34524|3 to 34568 also
(idk if my ears are correct on this one LMAO i'd say ask for others for this)
a double can be put here like how you did each measure, shouldn't be much of a playability problem imo
same with 15559