I think it would be better to delete those since you only represent drums with normal notes (doubles) and piano with long notes. It will be much better to keep it simple here.
Also if you'll apply this then move 56362|2 to col 3
this and every other similar mini anchor you did at the intro:
I will be honest, this looks so awful. (sorry)
Just place them on different column because they are different pitches if you will listen closely. Also because of that there are some inconsistencies:
Example 1: 1875|2,2037|2 and 4470|4,4632|3 - Here you only made the mini anchor for the first one but then for the second timestamp they are placed on different column.
Example 2: 902|2,1064|2 and 11443|3,11605|1,11767|4 - If i'm not mistaken they represent the same sounds yet are completely different. And in the second timestamp it represents the flow better (imo).
There are also couple more of those anchor things later but you can just find them and change yourself.
I don't quite understand their purpose? Compared to the rest of the intro that's the only place to use doubles for these sounds which is inconsistent imo. I would give 2 ways of solving this:
Add a note for each LN (or almost each one) in the intro and replace 8037|3 to col 1 and 8362|1 to col 3 because they look really awkward the way they are placed right now.
OR
Just get rid of the 8037|3,8037|4,8362|1,8362|4 doubles.
I personally think second option would be better since it'll make the intro consistent but it's up to you
This is by far the biggest spike of the file. I partially understand where you're getting this, but at the same time its too much for a hard. This is simply too dense for how long it is. This is also the second time you seem to be following the melody despite ignoring it for the rest of the section. The 1/4s dont follow the percussion so it really stands out. Along with that, the jack patterns of 103227|1,103227|2,103389|1,103389|2 and 103713|4,103713|3,103875|3,103875|4 Contradict what happens in the music. You have a kick on 103227|1,103227|2 and 103875|3,103875|4 while everything else is a snare, but the two kicks are the notes involved in the jack. Listening to the music, you would expect 103389|2,103389|1,103551|1,103551|4 as well as 102740|4,102740|2,102902|3,102902|1 to be the notes that jack. If you chose to continue ignoring the melody for the whole section, you should really focus on the 1/4 for percussion here. It would make the section much stronger.
88308 to 103065 - This section feels really weak, and almost unfinished. It is by far the worst secretion of the chart imo. You dont follow the melody like you did at 86038, and the chart is worse for it. Its one of the more intense sections of the song, so i would expect the chart to reflect that. I really think ignoring it was the wrong choice.
its hard to tell, but this sounds like a ghost note. i might be a repeated note the same pitch as 87010|1,87010|4, but its hard to tell. Since its so hard to tell if a note is actually there, i think it would be best to remove this note.
the 1/4 for piano stops here, so its kinda odd that you choose to keep 1/4 streams. the only 1/4 i hear in the section is the soft cymbal ticks that have been going on throughout the entire section so to suddenly start following them feels odd. Its a more difficulty sectoin so with how quiet the sound is, i feel it takes away from the piano 1/4s
A lot of kicks seemed to have been missed throughout the chart, usually right after snares. You should take a closer look and make sure your consistent with charting them as jumps.
considering that these are a different instrument, i would avoid trilling this with the previous two notes. This also appears to be the only time this sound is given lns in the section.
Remove your username from the tags. Your name is already in the creator's box
wait i forgot you changed your username. you can ignore this mod
Ghost note
Add a double here
You have a triple here. Remove one of the normal notes. Also add a note to 112470 on col 4 for the kick sound
Should be double. (also move 108416|1 to col 3 and 108740|3 to col 1)
Strange double. There are no other doubles in this trill and this one doesn't even fit well.
Should be double
Should be double
Should be double
Looking at 89119 seems like you missed a double here.
Should be double
I think it would be better to delete those since you only represent drums with normal notes (doubles) and piano with long notes. It will be much better to keep it simple here.
Also if you'll apply this then move 56362|2 to col 3
57984, 58470, 58795 - They all should be doubles
57660 - this one too
Should be a double
SORRY I MEANT 41606 (forgot to copy the timestamp lol)
In my opinion it would be better to move it to col 1. Firstly it'd be easier to hit the roll and secondly you'd get rid of 3 note anchor.
this and every other similar mini anchor you did at the intro:
I will be honest, this looks so awful. (sorry)
Just place them on different column because they are different pitches if you will listen closely. Also because of that there are some inconsistencies:
Example 1: 1875|2,2037|2 and 4470|4,4632|3 - Here you only made the mini anchor for the first one but then for the second timestamp they are placed on different column.
Example 2: 902|2,1064|2 and 11443|3,11605|1,11767|4 - If i'm not mistaken they represent the same sounds yet are completely different. And in the second timestamp it represents the flow better (imo).
There are also couple more of those anchor things later but you can just find them and change yourself.
I don't quite understand their purpose? Compared to the rest of the intro that's the only place to use doubles for these sounds which is inconsistent imo. I would give 2 ways of solving this:
OR
I personally think second option would be better since it'll make the intro consistent but it's up to you
uh yeah dont mind 1. … or 1. … lmao
the quad here feels a bit excessive.
missed jump
there is a lot of 23232323232 going on in this section, you might want to take a look at the patterns again and move some notes around.
A lot of the 1/2 sections have a lot of 2323232 going on actually.
This is by far the biggest spike of the file. I partially understand where you're getting this, but at the same time its too much for a hard. This is simply too dense for how long it is. This is also the second time you seem to be following the melody despite ignoring it for the rest of the section. The 1/4s dont follow the percussion so it really stands out. Along with that, the jack patterns of 103227|1,103227|2,103389|1,103389|2 and 103713|4,103713|3,103875|3,103875|4 Contradict what happens in the music. You have a kick on 103227|1,103227|2 and 103875|3,103875|4 while everything else is a snare, but the two kicks are the notes involved in the jack. Listening to the music, you would expect 103389|2,103389|1,103551|1,103551|4 as well as 102740|4,102740|2,102902|3,102902|1 to be the notes that jack. If you chose to continue ignoring the melody for the whole section, you should really focus on the 1/4 for percussion here. It would make the section much stronger.
ghost note
i dont really see what warrants the hand here.
88308 to 103065 - This section feels really weak, and almost unfinished. It is by far the worst secretion of the chart imo. You dont follow the melody like you did at 86038, and the chart is worse for it. Its one of the more intense sections of the song, so i would expect the chart to reflect that. I really think ignoring it was the wrong choice.
missing jump
its hard to tell, but this sounds like a ghost note. i might be a repeated note the same pitch as 87010|1,87010|4, but its hard to tell. Since its so hard to tell if a note is actually there, i think it would be best to remove this note.
missing 1/4 note
missing 1/4 note
this is an odd jump. i dont really hear anything on this note that is different from other singles with similar sounds.
the 1/4 for piano stops here, so its kinda odd that you choose to keep 1/4 streams. the only 1/4 i hear in the section is the soft cymbal ticks that have been going on throughout the entire section so to suddenly start following them feels odd. Its a more difficulty sectoin so with how quiet the sound is, i feel it takes away from the piano 1/4s
ghost notes. i dont hear any piano here.
this note is odd, as its the only time anything other than the LNs are charted during this section.
The sound happens other times in the section, but this is the only one that is charted
These lns are a bit early. they should be moved back 1/4 later
missing jump
missing jump
A lot of kicks seemed to have been missed throughout the chart, usually right after snares. You should take a closer look and make sure your consistent with charting them as jumps.
considering that these are a different instrument, i would avoid trilling this with the previous two notes. This also appears to be the only time this sound is given lns in the section.
i would expect this note to also have an ln like the rest.