17744, 21010, 24275 all have redundant doubles (no instrument found at these timelines), remove them (and change their respective following doubles to a triple)
idk if this is intentional but imo differentiating 3-note chains (eg 14326) and 5-note chains (15959) would be better rhythm-representation-wise than "uniting" both into five continuous 1/4 doubles
no vocal here or anything emphasize'able, better to use a double i think
applies to 101367 as well
also 125959 (use a single for this cuz no snare also) and 199428
how about making this a triple to connect with the vocal chunk from 28000 to 28612
same with 28612 (also cuz there's a vocal here)
also 41061
for a more convincing reason, it also helps keeping reasonable consistency w/ 96571 (and similar iterations)
17744, 21010, 24275 all have redundant doubles (no instrument found at these timelines), remove them (and change their respective following doubles to a triple)
also 83051, 86316, 89581, 92847
204683, 207949, 211214, 214479, 217744
idk if this is intentional but imo differentiating 3-note chains (eg 14326) and 5-note chains (15959) would be better rhythm-representation-wise than "uniting" both into five continuous 1/4 doubles