reduce this to a double, as the vocal is very similar to 105158
104782|2,104782|3,104782|1,105032|2,105032|1,105032|3,105157|2,105157|3,105407|1,105407|2,105407|3,105532|2
missed my intention of the vocal slowly descending in intensity
i don't think there's a sound on this 1/3 line? move it to the 1/4 snap above
disagree with this since it's to represent the nonquantized vocals with a simplified rhythm to keep the flow of the section without any weird gaps
i don't think this sound is impactful enough to allow for a quad. currently you have been adding quads for kick+vocal, or snare+vocal, but here it is just a vocal
it was to match the repetition of 96657|1,96657|2,96657|4,96657|3,96782|1,96782|2 but yeah sure changed it
consider moving these notes to column 3 and 2 respectively to follow the same concept you were using previously, at 65658
you can move 66408|2 to column 4 if you would like comfortability
there's no sound here, the hat-like sound ends at 52533
same w/ 56595|2
ruins the flow if you remove it so i'll just say that it's extended to represent the vocals since this is a dump anyway same with 56595|2
i'm not sure why you're choosing to not represent this as a double, despite it being the same sound as 50283
was for vocal dump and not the percussion
these should be moved to the 1/4 line below as they are currently not synced with the song
same w/ 176075|1,176075|2
why was this mapped differently to 12907 even though they are similar (and would still fit)
clearly different vocal rhythm lol
should be a triple due to it being a kick
Missing triple for vocals
Same for 35407|3,35407|4 as you did for 37407|1,37407|2,37407|3
works better to emphasise 36907|2,36907|1,36907|4,37032|2,37032|3,37032|4 and same technique used at 37282|2,37282|4 but you didn't mention it ig
reduce this to a double, as the vocal is very similar to 105158
104782|2,104782|3,104782|1,105032|2,105032|1,105032|3,105157|2,105157|3,105407|1,105407|2,105407|3,105532|2
missed my intention of the vocal slowly descending in intensity
i don't think there's a sound on this 1/3 line? move it to the 1/4 snap above
disagree with this since it's to represent the nonquantized vocals with a simplified rhythm to keep the flow of the section without any weird gaps
i don't think this sound is impactful enough to allow for a quad. currently you have been adding quads for kick+vocal, or snare+vocal, but here it is just a vocal
it was to match the repetition of 96657|1,96657|2,96657|4,96657|3,96782|1,96782|2 but yeah sure changed it
consider moving these notes to column 3 and 2 respectively to follow the same concept you were using previously, at 65658
you can move 66408|2 to column 4 if you would like comfortability
there's no sound here, the hat-like sound ends at 52533
same w/ 56595|2
ruins the flow if you remove it so i'll just say that it's extended to represent the vocals since this is a dump anyway same with 56595|2
i'm not sure why you're choosing to not represent this as a double, despite it being the same sound as 50283
was for vocal dump and not the percussion
these should be moved to the 1/4 line below as they are currently not synced with the song
same w/ 176075|1,176075|2
why was this mapped differently to 12907 even though they are similar (and would still fit)
clearly different vocal rhythm lol
should be a triple due to it being a kick
Missing triple for vocals
Same for 35407|3,35407|4 as you did for 37407|1,37407|2,37407|3
works better to emphasise 36907|2,36907|1,36907|4,37032|2,37032|3,37032|4 and same technique used at 37282|2,37282|4 but you didn't mention it ig