should be a triple due to it being a kick
these should be moved to the 1/4 line below as they are currently not synced with the song
same w/ 176075|1,176075|2
consider moving these notes to column 3 and 2 respectively to follow the same concept you were using previously, at 65658
you can move 66408|2 to column 4 if you would like comfortability
i don't think this sound is impactful enough to allow for a quad. currently you have been adding quads for kick+vocal, or snare+vocal, but here it is just a vocal
it was to match the repetition of 96657|1,96657|2,96657|4,96657|3,96782|1,96782|2 but yeah sure changed it
i don't think there's a sound on this 1/3 line? move it to the 1/4 snap above
disagree with this since it's to represent the nonquantized vocals with a simplified rhythm to keep the flow of the section without any weird gaps
Missing triple for vocals
Same for 35407|3,35407|4 as you did for 37407|1,37407|2,37407|3
works better to emphasise 36907|2,36907|1,36907|4,37032|2,37032|3,37032|4 and same technique used at 37282|2,37282|4 but you didn't mention it ig
why was this mapped differently to 12907 even though they are similar (and would still fit)
clearly different vocal rhythm lol
i'm not sure why you're choosing to not represent this as a double, despite it being the same sound as 50283
was for vocal dump and not the percussion
there's no sound here, the hat-like sound ends at 52533
same w/ 56595|2
ruins the flow if you remove it so i'll just say that it's extended to represent the vocals since this is a dump anyway same with 56595|2
reduce this to a double, as the vocal is very similar to 105158
104782|2,104782|3,104782|1,105032|2,105032|1,105032|3,105157|2,105157|3,105407|1,105407|2,105407|3,105532|2
missed my intention of the vocal slowly descending in intensity
should be a triple due to it being a kick
these should be moved to the 1/4 line below as they are currently not synced with the song
same w/ 176075|1,176075|2
consider moving these notes to column 3 and 2 respectively to follow the same concept you were using previously, at 65658
you can move 66408|2 to column 4 if you would like comfortability
i don't think this sound is impactful enough to allow for a quad. currently you have been adding quads for kick+vocal, or snare+vocal, but here it is just a vocal
it was to match the repetition of 96657|1,96657|2,96657|4,96657|3,96782|1,96782|2 but yeah sure changed it
i don't think there's a sound on this 1/3 line? move it to the 1/4 snap above
disagree with this since it's to represent the nonquantized vocals with a simplified rhythm to keep the flow of the section without any weird gaps
Missing triple for vocals
Same for 35407|3,35407|4 as you did for 37407|1,37407|2,37407|3
works better to emphasise 36907|2,36907|1,36907|4,37032|2,37032|3,37032|4 and same technique used at 37282|2,37282|4 but you didn't mention it ig
why was this mapped differently to 12907 even though they are similar (and would still fit)
clearly different vocal rhythm lol
i'm not sure why you're choosing to not represent this as a double, despite it being the same sound as 50283
was for vocal dump and not the percussion
there's no sound here, the hat-like sound ends at 52533
same w/ 56595|2
ruins the flow if you remove it so i'll just say that it's extended to represent the vocals since this is a dump anyway same with 56595|2
reduce this to a double, as the vocal is very similar to 105158
104782|2,104782|3,104782|1,105032|2,105032|1,105032|3,105157|2,105157|3,105407|1,105407|2,105407|3,105532|2
missed my intention of the vocal slowly descending in intensity